NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell | ข่าวสารล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ speed d 7-11

Nội Dung Bài Viết

NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell | ข่าวทั่วไปรายวัน

สำหรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับ speed d 7-11 หรือข่าวที่เกี่ยวข้องอื่นๆ โปรดไปที่: sonduongpaper.vn การกระทำ

NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell และรูปภาพที่เกี่ยวข้องspeed d 7-11

NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell
NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell

See also  ล้อเกือบหลุดไปแล้ว. ดีนะที่มาอู่ก่อน. ช่างสันต์106 | จุ๊บ ยาง

speed d 7-11 และข้อมูลที่เกี่ยวข้อง

สถาบันมาตรฐานและเทคโนโลยีแห่งชาติ (NIST) ดำเนินการตรวจสอบทางวิทยาศาสตร์และทางเทคนิคเป็นเวลาสามปีในวันที่ 11 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2544 การล่มสลายของอาคารเวิลด์เทรดเซ็นเตอร์สูง 47 ชั้น 7 (WTC 7) ในนิวยอร์กซิตี้ วิดีโอนี้อธิบายผลการศึกษานี้ ซึ่งสรุปว่าไฟไหม้หลายชั้นในตึก WTC 7 ซึ่งไม่สามารถควบคุมได้ แต่อย่างอื่นคล้ายกับไฟไหม้ที่พบในอาคารสูงอื่นๆ ทำให้เกิดเหตุการณ์ที่ไม่ธรรมดา การทำความร้อนของคานและคานพื้นทำให้เสาค้ำวิกฤตล้มเหลว ทำให้เกิดการถล่มแบบก้าวหน้าที่เกิดจากไฟไหม้ซึ่งทำให้อาคารพังทลาย ดูรายละเอียดเพิ่มเติมได้ที่ : .

See also  10 อันดับที่เที่ยวสวิตเซอร์แลนด์ ที่ก่อนตายต้องได้ไป! EP.1 | switzerland สถานที่ท่องเที่ยว

>>> สามารถหาข้อมูลที่น่าสนใจอื่นๆ ได้ที่นี่ https://sonduongpaper.vn/
แบ่งปันที่นี่

#NIST #Video #Building #WTC7 #Fell.

NIST,conspiracy,WTC7,911,911truth,debunking911,World,Trade,Center,collapse,fire,New,York,investigation,progressive,terrorism,September,11,building,codes,structures,computer,model,columns,explosives.

NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell.

speed d 7-11.

เราหวังว่าคุณจะพบข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับ speed d 7-11 ที่นี่
ขอบคุณที่รับชมเนื้อหานี้

25 thoughts on “NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell | ข่าวสารล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ speed d 7-11

  1. piffdiddyash says:

    The statement "We have shown for the first time that fire can produce a progressive collapse," illustrates why so many people don't believe this. Not saying it's a conspiracy, but every time it's "the first time" something "rare" happens, you're going to have people calling bullshit. 

  2. Taylor Thompson says:

    Who said anything about traditional explosives? Obviously those would be out of the question. Is it possible that thermite could have weakened structure? Let's not forget what was found in an independent study in the dust. What happened to the fireproof coating on the steele? Did you take this into account in your "simulation"? One day the truth will come out, I hope it's in my lifetime so the families of the victims can finally have some peace.

  3. Duke Rourschach says:

    He actually said "We actually have a New kind of progressive collapse We have DISCOVERED here which is a "Fire Induced Collapse" and In "Fact" We've shown for the FIRST TIME that Fire can induce a collapse". That is NOT a scientifically sound conclusion! We don't know what Happened But We can Make up a New discovery to Explain our position! And we don't need Proof "Trust Us aahh come on come on why would we lie we love you so much Trust us we love you long time come on if not for me then do it for Uncle Sammy you know you want to come on Your only Cool if you believe us"! This is supposed to be a Group of Geniuses Top of their fields no wonder Levees fail and disaster befalls our Infrastructure LOOK who's making the rules it would be funny if so many people died as a result of their guidelines.

  4. MrKoenig1985 says:

    2:04 – One should examine the content and quality of the WTC 7 collapse videos obtained by NIST, then it would become quickly apparent why they didn't hear any explosion sounds.
    Lesson #1: Never make audio analyses on TV post-production mess and VHS degraded garbage!

    That the explosion sounds weren't picked up by of the videos is clearly not true, rather a lie by Mr. Sunder! See and hear NIST Cumulus clip "CBS-Net Dub5 09.avi". What's about that, Mr. Sunder?
    Not to speak about the witnesses. Maybe you have talked with "wrong" witnesses, who were miles away or not in NYC at this time at all, Mr. Sunder?

  5. MrKoenig1985 says:

    0:27 – A three year investigation into WTC 7? 2005 through 2008? That's not true!
    Many of WTC 7 aspects such as structural system, if comply with New York City Building Code, emergency power, alterations to fire safety/structural system, fire supression, fireproofing and HVAC were investigated much earlier by NIST WTC NCSTeam, parallel to the Towers investigation (Aug. 2002-Sep. 2005).
    That's proven by the 2005 public draft/final reports NCSTARs 1-1, 1-1A, 1-1C, 1-1D, 1-1E, 1-1G, 1-1I, and 1-1J. NCSTARs 1-4B, C, and D. NCSTAR 1-6A regarding WTC7's fireproofing Monokote MK-5.
    You can see a summary of all WTC7 relevant NIST reports in report NCSTAR 1-9, pp. 6-7, PDF pp. 50-51.

    From Sep. 2005 through Nov. 2008 only the remained aspect, the structural collapse of WTC 7, was investigated (WTCI Project 9, before Sep. 2005 planned as to be part of Project 6).
    In fact, the over three years, Sep. 2005-Nov. 2008, was a huge delay in the NIST's WTC7 investigation. That was actually the reason why the collapse of WTC7 was segregated from WTCI Project 6 ("Structural Collapse") and was put into a new Project, Project 9 ("Structural Collapse of WTC 7").

  6. MrKoenig1985 says:

    0:15 – Incredible bad quality CBS' West Street video, compared to the version in the Naudet documentary "9/11". What happened? Did the TV networks refuse to release complete unedited HQ raw videos? If so, then why didn't the NIST National Construction Safety Team use its sub-poena power given by the National Construction Safety Team Act? Or was the NIST Team not interested in RAW HQ and COMPLETE 9/11 footage of WTC 7 at all?
    The WTC 7 collapse videos released through NIST FOIA are heavily degraded, mostly due to VHS quality loss. 2:00 – How can anybody perform precise analyses on such ruined material? Visual and acoustical analyses?
    I think, the NCS Team knows what the GIGO principle is.

  7. Иля Попов says:

    “The explosion was beneath me….so when the explosion happened it blew us back….both buildings (the twin towers) were still standing,” he added.
    “I was trapped in there for several hours, I was trapped in there when both buildings came down – all this time I’m hearing all kinds of explosions, all this time I’m hearing explosions, said Jennings, adding that when firefighters took them down to the lobby it was in “total ruins.

    Barry Jennings – 9/11 Early Afternoon ABC7 Interview

     The first,absolutely clean,outspoken and unaffected interview with Barry Jennings,just after his rescue on 9/11/01.He is speaking about what had happened straight after the first plane strike.He was at the 23th floor and he heard the first explosion,much before the towers collapse.
     He died in August 2008,couple of days before the final NIST report about wtc7 ,in "unclear circumstances"…Sounds like an episode from the parody with Leslie Nielsen-Police Squad.

  8. Иля Попов says:

    Can I tell my opinion?If it was damaged on the right side,79th column and nearby,why it fell straight like in a controled demolition?Actually I hate all the conspirative teorists,but I think,that the owners of the building used the moment to collect the insurance:))

  9. Neil Edwards says:

    When a plane crashes, massive resources are put into recovering, examining and identifying every piece possible. Sometimes the ocean is dredged to recover wreckage (cf Swissair 111).

    By contrast, despite being a mass-murder scene, and despite the unprecedented manner of collapse, the steel from WTC was shipped to China for recycling, leaving NIST with only "videos, photos, witness accounts and other data".

    A simple question for NIST: didn't you find that ever so slightly extraordinary?

  10. Oldschooldan1 says:

    The bldg didn’t fall symmetrically into its own footprint; it fell east to west causing millions of dollars worth of damage to the Verizon bldg across the street.
    6 seconds….try 18.
    The firemen were told 3 hrs prior to the collapse to leave the area because they knew the bldg was unsafe and going to collapse.
    Countless eyewitnesses to a count down; try one, that’s it, one lone guy.
    When a steel column buckles how much resistance does it offer?

  11. C. S. Christopher says:

    It's not impossible. Reason it hasn't happened before is because firefighters have been able to extinguish the fire before it brings the building down. In this case the fire lines had been destroyed by the WTC collapse and so fire fighters did not have the means necessary to bring the fire under control. Instead the fires continued to rage hour and hour and eventually the structure gave in and the building collapsed. This is not the first time something happens for the first time in history.

  12. FrancisM says:

    Why are you easy on a modern building getting severely compromised that way?

    I understand the tragic circumstances surrounding the event, but are really the responsible of those shortcoming not being asked for answers?.

    "Lack of water" is actually a poor excuse, After an earthquake or other catastrophic events, water pipes are easily cut and disrupted. How many buildings out there may suffer WTC 7's fate?

  13. nineeleven twentyfourseven says:

    In their analysis of this collapse NIST have made many errors. The connection at column 79 that they say failed has been misrepresented by them, They got dimensions of some elements wrong, and missed out other crucial elements entirely. Also, their thermal expansion calculations for the beams to the east of the girder that they say failed are just plain.. If the correct elements, figures and equations are used it becomes clear that NISTs explanation for WTC7 is pure fiction.

  14. CC Bone says:

    uh huh … so.. let's REVERSE the question … why have other buildings that have had burning passenger jets imbedded in them in a very similar fashion remained completely intact, some burning for years? Why didn't all this mumbo-jumbo BS 'science' have the same effect in those cases? NONE of these other building ever eventually collapsed… the fires eventually burnt out, leaving the structures'
    shell.

  15. Ken Abelson says:

    Symmetry. Through the point of greatest resistance. Into its own footprint. Perfectly. In 6 seconds. Comon now.

    50 videos right here on Youtube of firemen and others saying "get out of the way, this building is going to fall." Countless eyewitness accounts of "count downs."

    NIST itself admitting free fall for a short period. Zero resistance. Steel? It offered zero resistance. The truth will come out.

    I note that all posts to this video undergo censorship before posting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *